On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 09:34:47PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010, 22:20:01 schrieb Neil Jerram:
> >> For the record... I was just going to follow up to this, when I saw Tim
> >> Abell's new thread, and I've put my main thoughts there instead.  As
> >> far as this thread is concerned, the summary of the "report back" is
> >> that I haven't yet been able to recreate a setup that successfully
> >> builds something similar to what I have running on my phone.
> >
> > In the /etc/shr-version file is the git revision of the Openembedded 
> > branche 
> > the image was build from.
> 
> I had already seen that, but thank you for (implicitly) indicating that
> it is the authoritative place for build version information.  (For
> example, there's also /etc/version, which on my phone says
> 201005031156.)
> 
> My /etc/shr-version says:
> 
> Tag Name: shr/testing2009-1rc1
> VERSION: d9df9d9aee12d719dc306063c32ce8cdc6821789
> Branch: shr/testing2010
> Build Host: opmbuild
> Time Stamp: Mon, 03 May 2010 11:59:06 +0200

Tag Name: is latest tag created from Branch:, but because revision
shown in VERSION: is for sure much newer than what was tagged in
shr/testing2009-1rc1, then please don't checkout that tag, but branch
shr/testing2010 (automatically done by Makefile) and to build exactly
same version checkout revision d9df9d9aee12d719dc306063c32ce8cdc6821789.
> 
> So, after ensuring the dependencies and doing `make setup' as described
> at http://shr-project.org/trac/wiki/Building%20SHR, I went to
> shr-testing/openembedded and did
> 
> $ git checkout shr/testing2009-1rc1
> $ git checkout -b nj
> 
> to create a new branch starting from shr/testing2009-1rc1.
> 
> Is it OK to build in the shr-testing subtree, instead of the
> shr-unstable one?  If not, perhaps that's the cause of my problem.
> 
> I also had to guess what to do with the other Git repositories in the
> overall tree:
> 
> common/.git: left as it was on `master'
> 
> openembedded/.git: same as shr-testing/openembedded/.git - i.e. I
> created a branch from shr/testing2009-1rc1
> 
> bitbake/.git: left as it was on `1.10'
> 
> Does that all sound correct?
> 
> So then, in shr-testing, I did `make image'.  (To begin with without any      
>   
> local.conf, later with the suggested contents of
> 
> PARALLEL_MAKE = "-j 4"
> BB_NUMBER_THREADS = "4"
> GLIBC_GENERATE_LOCALES = "en_US.UTF-8"
> 
> )
> 
> I hit the following sequence of errors.
> 
> 1. Failure running svn in matchbox-panel-2_svn.bb recipe, because
> matchbox-panel-2-icon-themes had already added some unversioned files in
> the "applets" subtree, and a similar set of files is now present in the
> upstream matchbox-panel-2 SVN.  I worked around this by removing
> matchbox-panel-2-icon-themes from the DEPENDS line in
> matchbox-panel-2_svn.bb.

That's known issue, svn doesn't like overwritting unversioned files. Use
google, I've described it >5 times and already fixed it in OE master.
ie:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02741.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg08809.html

> 2. Something in ffalarms_svn.bb - which I worked around by just deleting
> ffalarms_svn.bb, since I don't use ffalarms myself.

Depends on "something"..
 
> 3. Failure compiling phoneuid, because of:
> | make[2]: *** No rule to make target 
> `/home/neil/shr/shr-testing/tmp/staging/armv4t-oe-linux-gnueabi/usr/share/shr-specs/org.shr.phoneui.Settings.xml',
>  needed by `phoneuid-settings-service-glue.h'.  Stop.

don't remember this onem sirrt

> And at this point I took a break.  It seemed to me that all of these
> problems were caused by downloading newer Git/SVN trees than were used
> at the time that shr/testing2009-1rc1 was actually released.

Well that tag is 11 months old revision 1baf432efc883a74c12dddf9aa4fbbaea2b03e50

Your shr-t revision d9df9d9aee12d719dc306063c32ce8cdc6821789 is only 5 months 
old 
from 2010-05-03 08:50:36.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to