On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:26:23 +0100 (CET), Cristiano Guadagnino wrote:
>>First of all, we must update current sources to Sibyl fix 4
>I'm not sure this is a good idea. fix 4 is heavily bugged,
>and contain half-implemented features. Fix 3 is much more
>stable. Unless someone is already on the job of fixing the
>bugs in fix 4, I would stay with fix 3.
Sources is nearest to fix 4. And i don't want move sources back to fix 3. It's somt as
error correction in fix 4.
>>Of couse, current ide ugly. I don't like editor (I think use about E-MLE as editor),
>No
>>debuging. And many features from Deplhi RAD. This is in future. If anyone want
make
>>some feature - You are welcome. But we don't make something yet :-)
>?? I don't understand you. What are you missing in the
>current IDE?
Some small features from Delphi (like quickhelp, while entering objectname)
> And what do you mean by "no debugging"? Sibyl
>IDE DOES allow integrated debugging.
But doesn't work :- ( (fix 3 & 4)
> And I don't think an
>E-MLE is anyway better than Sybil's IDE text editor.
Better, because configurable & extensible.For example, i don't like WordStart style
text
editor and want CUA keys. And??? Nothing. I can't redefine keys, can't change
selection type. Another example: I want rexx hilighting (for rexx-macros), of couse,
pascal based editor doesn't allow make this and i will be use another editor.
Oopps... May be you don't know about E-MLE? E-MLE is E-Multi Line Editing control.
EPM based on them.
>Could you elaborate please?
I'm try.
In most cases Sibyl IDE monolitic application. Can you reconfigure menu system? Can
you redefine keys? Can I use drag from toolbar and drop to form instead click & click?
All answers is no. This is my minimal requests for IDE.
-----------
To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe sibyl
end
