On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:08:13 -0500 (EST), Yuri Prokushev wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:26:23 +0100 (CET), Cristiano Guadagnino wrote:
>
>>>First of all, we must update current sources to Sibyl fix 4
<snip>
>
>>>Of couse, current ide ugly. I don't like editor (I think use about E-MLE as
>editor), No
>>>debuging. And many features from Deplhi RAD. This is in future. If anyone want
>make
>>>some feature - You are welcome. But we don't make something yet :-)
>
>>?? I don't understand you. What are you missing in the
>>current IDE?
>Some small features from Delphi (like quickhelp, while entering objectname)
>
>> And what do you mean by "no debugging"? Sibyl
>>IDE DOES allow integrated debugging.
>But doesn't work :- ( (fix 3 & 4)
>> And I don't think an
>>E-MLE is anyway better than Sybil's IDE text editor.
>Better, because configurable & extensible.For example, i don't like WordStart style
>text
>editor and want CUA keys. And??? Nothing. I can't redefine keys, can't change
>selection type. Another example: I want rexx hilighting (for rexx-macros), of couse,
>pascal based editor doesn't allow make this and i will be use another editor.
>
>Oopps... May be you don't know about E-MLE? E-MLE is E-Multi Line Editing control.
>EPM based on them.
>
>>Could you elaborate please?
>I'm try.
>
>In most cases Sibyl IDE monolitic application. Can you reconfigure menu system? Can
>you redefine keys? Can I use drag from toolbar and drop to form instead click & click?
>All answers is no. This is my minimal requests for IDE.
>
How much work would it be to make a way to use your own editor? Say I want to use
e.exe for some reason
(yeah, bad idea, but....) or some other editor, maybe EPM in place of generic E-MLE?
Then IDE editor doesn't
have to be all things to all people. I agree with Yuri though - make the IDE editor
configurable to some extent.
Just an idea.
Ray Hampton
-----------
To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe sibyl
end
