From: "Yuri Prokushev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 05:55:42 -0400 (EDT)
Priority: Normal
Subject: Re: [Sibyl] Answers needed
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > You have to pass the command line options according to the setting
> >from the IDE. What about parsing the compiler output to be able to
> >find out location of possible errors and giving it back to the IDE?
> Not so easy as for command-line options. Compiler output not standard
> (depended on language file). I prefer to make changes in compiler
> sources. Or something else. I don't know yet.
Parsing is the easier part probably, in fact - FP IDE already does
the same, so you can use code from its sources. Finding the way to
pass this information to the IDE might be more difficult, IMHO (maybe
it isn't, I haven't tried to study it). BTW, you can easily invoke
the compiler with whatever language file, since it's you who starts
the (external) compiler and passes the parameters. But I think error
parsing doesn't depend on the chosen message file anyway.
> > BTW, I'm already subscribed to the list, so you don't have Cc: your
> >messages to my own address.
> :) This is my usual practic. I "reply to all", not just reply (because
> in some cases replied only to sender not to whole list). But if you
> prefer get messages only from maillist I will not reply to your box,
> only to maillist's box.
Yes please, stop it. I definitely don't need to get all your
messages twice. ;-) The list changes the Reply-To header, so it
should be perfectly safe if you use a mailer which honors this
setting.
Tomas
-----------
To unsubscribe yourself from this list, send the following message
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe sibyl
end
