At 4:18 AM -0400 8/25/10, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an
alternate trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the
sidr meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg
consensus that draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative
format.
Please respond so that the authors can represent wg consensus in the
draft. The call for consensus will end Sept 8.
--Sandy
I am in favor of the WG switching to the simpler format, but only if
the issues I raised on the list and at the meeting are addressed.
Also, I would not characterize the question as you did above. Isn't
the proposal for a (hopefully revised) version of Sam's draft to
replace sidr-ta-04?
Steve
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
