>I am in favor of the WG switching to the simpler format, but only if >the issues I raised on the list and at the meeting are addressed.
Good. >Also, I would not characterize the question as you did above. Isn't >the proposal for a (hopefully revised) version of Sam's draft to >replace sidr-ta-04? Sam's message to the list said: >I encourage the WG to adopt this format in place of the one in the current WG >doc. I read that as asking for adoption of the format in the current draft, not of adoption of an alternate draft. Not that it matters, actually. The same (revised) format would result in either case. --Sandy, speaking as wg chair. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
