On 26/08/2010, at 9:27 AM, Stephen Kent wrote: > At 4:18 AM -0400 8/25/10, Sandra Murphy wrote: >> Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate >> trust anchor representation format from that proposed in >> draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the sidr >> meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht. >> >> I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg consensus that >> draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative format. >> >> Please respond so that the authors can represent wg consensus in the draft. >> The call for consensus will end Sept 8. >> >> --Sandy > > I am in favor of the WG switching to the simpler format, but only if the > issues I raised on the list and at the meeting are addressed. Also, I would > not characterize the question as you did above. Isn't the proposal for a > (hopefully revised) version of Sam's draft to replace sidr-ta-04?
I am happy to work with Sam to produce a single co-edited draft, if Sam is equally willing to do so. Sam? Geoff _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
