It seems that the alt-doc has some revising to be done though adoption by the WG seems like the right path here. Some author-author discussion is being done, with some doc updates. I think the WG wants this to be at LC in/before Bejing. We have a month to do that work.
Unless there are complaints about this, please get a last rev in before Bejing so it can start LC just before the meeting. -Chris (wg co-chair shoes on) On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote: > >> Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate >> trust anchor representation format from that proposed in >> draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the sidr >> meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht. >> >> I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg consensus >> that draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative format. > > Yup. > >> >> Please respond so that the authors can represent wg consensus in the >> draft. The call for consensus will end Sept 8. >> >> --Sandy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > -- > Never criticize a man till you've walked a mile in his shoes. Then if he > didn't like what you've said, he's a mile away and barefoot. > > > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
