Hi Alexey and list, I oppose this acceptance call. The draft makes no reference to the conflict with the CP draft (6484) [1] with respect to the requirement that certificates issued by a CA conform to the record of current holdings. If a grandchild is not listed in the record of current holdings, a 6484 compliant CA must not issue certificates in their name; if the grandchild is listed the record of current holdings, then they are no longer a grandchild, and there is no need for a grandparenting process.
Byron [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6484 sections 1.1, 1.4, and 4.2.2. On 05/08/2012, at 4:12 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Hi, > On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance call > for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th. Please > send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or directly to > chairs. > > Thank you, > Alexey > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
