On 8/10/12 5:38 PM, "Murphy, Sandra" <[email protected]> wrote:

>speaking as regular ol' member:
>
>wrt:
>------
>(But this is sort of my point, the RPKI system's verification of right of
>use breaks down if you start certifying multiple people as having a
>simultaneous right to use resources :-)
>------
>
>The CA certs assert the right to use resources.  The ROAs assert
>authorization to originate routes.  That's different.
>
>There can be multiple ROAs for the same address space, so people can be
>multi-homed.  (This could maybe also be useful in AS migration cases.)
>
>I believe Doug Montgomery is right.  By the algorithm for validating BGP
>routes, issuing one ROA does not "trump" other existing ROAs, and thereby
>make previously valid routes look invalid.

Certainly that is the way the the origin validation algorithm works.  But
as I noted before, there is text in idr-as0 and RFC6491 that *might* lead
one to believe AS0 ROAs have "special powers".  Some additional text,
maybe in prefix-validate, to explicitly note the multiple matching ROA
situation might be useful.

As for grandfathering ... We seem to struggle without a clear, and/or
shared technical definition of "right to use".   Personally, when an ISP
is allocated a block to use for customer assignment,  in my mind it has
the "right to use that block" (in the common language sense).  Even if
sub-blocks are assigned to customers.   The ISP might sign other types of
objects with EE certs from the aggregate block CA.

As Sandy notes, right to use is a different concept than route origination
authorization.   If we are careful to keep those concepts distinct in the
conversation ... It will help.

dougm

>

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to