On Aug 10, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Murphy, Sandra wrote: > speaking as co-chair > > A reminder to the group that the question is whether to adopt this draft as a > working group work item. The content of the draft is not the discussion > point here, the acceptance for the group to work on it. > > Whether you like the content or not, you should say whether you think the wg > should adopt this draft. > > --Sandy, speaking as co-chair
I do not think this should be adopted as a wg item. I think the topic of this draft fits better as supporting text in another existing draft (we have a plethora of those to choose from), but the contributions / opinions in this draft do not (imho) stand firmly enough on their own to be an atomic draft. Eric _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
