My recommendation would be to follow the registry.
If the parent disappears then the grandparent should re-allocate the
resource to the grandchildren (which then will become a new child).
IMHO is the only way to guarantee some RPKI <-> allocation consistency.
Regards,
as
Disclaimer: I work for a grandparent but this is my personal view.
On 29 Aug 2012, at 12:10, Murphy, Sandra wrote:
> Speaking as wg co-chair:
>
> Certainly a very lively acceptance call!
>
> The chairs do not see that there was consensus that the wg should adopt this
> draft.
>
> But there was ample evidence that the wg was interested in the issue - by the
> wg spending lots of time discussing the issue.
>
> So that leaves the chairs with an ambivalent message. The wg is very
> interested in the topic but not in adopting a draft that would record any
> decisions about the topic.
>
> What would the wg like to do now? Particularly those who disagreed with the
> content of the draft - if you would dislike the recommendations, are you OK
> with no recommendations instead?
>
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
>
> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Alexey
> Melnikov [[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 2:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [sidr] WG acceptance call for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting
>
> Hi,
> On behalf of SIDR WG chairs I would like to initiate 2 weeks acceptance call
> for draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting starting from today, August 4th. Please
> send your positive or negative feedback to the mailing list or directly to
> chairs.
>
> Thank you,
> Alexey
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
