On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Danny McPherson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> 1) show/agree that this is a problem (route leaks) > > Do you believe this is a problem? When describing events such as this as > of late, what did you call it?
sure, but I'm not the grow-wg ... right? aim that question over -> <mailto: [email protected]> there. >> 2) see if bgp data already has the right bits to fix this (idr) >> 3) slap some verification on those bits > > Are you presupposing this needs to be done *in* BGP? > I'm not presupposing, I'm saying that today you CAN do what you want with IRR data, some folks do this with varying degrees of success/failure. you could improve this with RPKI (or resource certification)... you'd still be limited to those folks who do filtering to begin with. You might pickup more filterers with 'more simpler filteringz', but that's a gamble. If you want to be closer to a solution, do it in the protocol that sends the data around, tag the route with a bit(s) that say: "customer" or "provider" or "transit" or "jimmyhat" ... sign that bit(s) and let's march on. -chris _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
