On Nov 7, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Danny McPherson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Nov 7, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> SIDR has worked on a few things, one of which is RPKI, which is really > just 'resource certification'. It's added to that the idea that you > could verify the origin of a route you hear, and later that the > originator could sign the outgoing route such that folk down the line > could say: "Yes, that really did originate from FOO-AS". Later/now > it's trying to say that the other portion of the path (other than > origin) could be verified so you believe the path as you see it is the > path the route followed to get to you. Right, but did anyone who was involved in remediating that Moratel leak say, ``we're all set, I can see the path of the leak, it's miller time!''? I'm pretty sure verifying the leak is not the same as remediating it. Eric _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
