On Nov 7, 2012, at 3:56 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > I'm not presupposing, I'm saying that today you CAN do what you want > with IRR data, some folks do this with varying degrees of > success/failure. you could improve this with RPKI (or resource > certification)... you'd still be limited to those folks who do > filtering to begin with. You might pickup more filterers with 'more > simpler filteringz', but that's a gamble.
But forcing BGPSEC/RPKI on everyone is better? Ohh, and you still have to solve the IRR-esque problem. And the RPKI/BGPSEC steamroller is squashing low-hanging fruit. > If you want to be closer to a solution, do it in the protocol that > sends the data around, tag the route with a bit(s) that say: > "customer" or "provider" or "transit" or "jimmyhat" ... sign that > bit(s) and let's march on. Right, that's the disconnect. IF you start with solving this IN BGP, you end up here [sidr]. -danny _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
