Please take 2 weeks time to consider:
"This document was adopted as a WG work item, should we accept this
change and complete the work or not?"
Adopting a doc as a WG item does not mean that it is acceptable
"as is" at the time it was adopted. The intent is that the author(s)
will cooperate with WG members to refine the doc as comments are posted.
This doc has received detailed comments, posted to the list, to which the
authors have never deigned to respond. It is very poorly written, and the
specific change it describes (vaguely) is not technically consistent with
the part of RFC (6487) that it purports to be updating.
So, unless the folks who volunteered to assume responsibility for the doc
(all of whom were already listed as co-authors) are prepared to do a much
better job in addressing these shortcomings, I object to continuing with
this work.
Steve
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
