> the intent is an appropriate change to improve robustness of the > system.
i think it changes the robustness, not necessarily improves it. the loss of congruent hierarchic validation is exchanged for accepting some failures we have yet to see. being a bit of a naggumite, accepting errors is not big on my agenda. one of my disagreements with dr postel was the receiver side of the robustness principle. this way lies entropic death. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
