On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:19 AM, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2014, at 8:26 PM, Hannigan, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >> That and isn't the IETF the right venue to carve out a specific from a /8? >> This is in effect global policy, isn't it? > > I suppose APNIC could throw it back to IANA (maybe? not sure how an RIR can > throw a /24 back to IANA -- perhaps that needs a global policy too?) who > could, after a couple of years after a global policy is established, put that > prefix into the IPv4 special registry. > > However, in the meantime, is there a problem with APNIC declaring it "anycast > to support DNS infrastructure" now? Not that I can tell. Best, -M< * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
