On Jan 26, 2014, at 8:26 PM, Hannigan, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > That and isn't the IETF the right venue to carve out a specific from a /8? > This is in effect global policy, isn't it?
I suppose APNIC could throw it back to IANA (maybe? not sure how an RIR can throw a /24 back to IANA -- perhaps that needs a global policy too?) who could, after a couple of years after a global policy is established, put that prefix into the IPv4 special registry. However, in the meantime, is there a problem with APNIC declaring it "anycast to support DNS infrastructure" now? > On Jan 25, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: >> and why won't this leak and make confusion? You mean more than it is leaking and causing confusion now? Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
