David Conrad wrote: On Jan 26, 2014, at 8:26 PM, Hannigan, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > That and isn't the IETF the right venue to carve out a specific from > a /8? This is in effect global policy, isn't it? > > I suppose APNIC could throw it back to IANA (maybe? not sure how an > RIR can throw a /24 back to IANA -- perhaps that needs a global policy > too?)
I don't want to comment on which venue is appropriate. However, I can report that we have some experience with this kind of thing based on ARIN-prop-154, which ended up with RFC 6598. In that case, ARIN made a /10 available and we registered it in the IANA IPv4 Special-Purpose Address Registry when the draft was approved. The implementation of things like this is generally not a problem. Regards, Leo Vegoda ICANN, IANA
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
