Hi Raphael, > I think as long as nobody is announcing this out to the general Internet,
There is a reason why we have bogus prefix announcements for years. So, be ready for some loud noise. >³Any service with local-only significance within the autonomous system², and not limit >the use? I can see some other interesting uses that would not require >global routability, but need slightly more flexibility/reachability than >the usual RFC1918 space. Yes, I agree and support this view, the scope should be global. Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Raphael Ho <[email protected]>wrote: > I think as long as nobody is announcing this out to the general Internet, > this is an interesting proposal. If the prefix is allowed out on the > public Internet uncontrolled then I have a problem with potential DNS > hijacking and other issues (and I agree with Mr Hannigan that¹s where IETF > needs to come in) > > Assuming that the members agree that the prefix would not be internet > reachable, do we want expand the scope of the proposal to ³Any service > with local-only significance within the autonomous system², and not limit > the use? I can see some other interesting uses that would not require > global routability, but need slightly more flexibility/reachability than > the usual RFC1918 space. > > > > On 27/1/14 12:26 pm, "Hannigan, Martin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >That and isn't the IETF the right venue to carve out a specific from a > >/8? This is in effect global policy, isn't it? > > > > > >On Jan 25, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> and why won't this leak and make confusion? > >> > >> randy > >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > >> * > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sig-policy mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > > >* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > > * > >_______________________________________________ > >sig-policy mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
