This is worrying re Confer as I am quite sure I could register 100,000 people with unique addresses.
We've entered a new era of bots - this would not be hard. ...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com ; Keybase: https://keybase.io/skeeve IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Adam Gosling <a...@apnic.net> wrote: > Hi Randy > > > >>>> On 5/09/2016, 20:52, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > >> [ this is address policy? ] > > No this is not address policy. The SIG Guidelines are the rules of > procedure for all SIGs. The proposal was also sent to the other SIG mailing > lists, but will be discussed in the Policy SIG as there is more agenda time > there. > > >> Secondary, it can be used by fraud, like hijacking the position of > >> Chair agaist the Community by inviting many persons who never attend > >> the community discussion. > >> ... > >> I would like to propose limiting eligible voters of SIG Chair > election > >> to registered participants of APNIC Conference where the election is > >> held. > >> > >> In this context, registered participants include remote participants > >> who register to Confer, or its successor in future. > > is there an unstated assumption that many persons could attend the > meeting who are not registered locally or remotely? does that > assumption hold? > > The Secretariat doesn’t physically check registrations at the door to the > Policy SIG sessions, I guess a bunch of extra people could wander in > without badges. I’m not sure if we would notice. > > At present remote participation (using the CONFER tool) only requires a > simple registration with unique email address. We tried more stringent > registration procedures with the Webcasting (like ARIN) and got a lot of > negative feedback. > > > > I would like to propose aligning Chair' term with Co-Chair's term, > > which means that Chair and all Co-Chair will serve for same two > years. > > could make for a tough transition if both are replaced at the same > time. > > > randy > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
