On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:36 PM, 藤崎智宏 <[email protected]> wrote:
> APNIC Secretariat kindly provided the following data. I hope this will > help. > > +------+-----------+-----------+ +------+-------------+-----------+ > | | Total | Number of | | | Delegations | Number of | > | Year | Transfers | /24s | | Year | from 103/8 | /24s | > +------+-----------+-----------+ +------+-------------+-----------+ > | 2011 | 2 | 2 | | 2011 | 821 | 3032 | > | 2012 | 21 | 68 | | 2012 | 1028 | 3300 | > | 2013 | 16 | 61 | | 2013 | 1419 | 4767 | > | 2014 | 25 | 95 | | 2014 | 2095 | 7271 | > | 2015 | 67 | 266 | | 2015 | 2425 | 8316 | > | 2016 | 103 | 394 | | 2016 | 2966 | 9913 | > +------+-----------+-----------+ +------+-------------+-----------+ > Thank you, sir. In this case, as the number of "problemetic transfers" is such a low figure (eg, in 2016, out of the 10623 net allocations available, only 103 were transferred), I do not see the problem to warrant a new policy. Plus, as Jay Daley comments, this proposal will not really stop the transfer, just stop APNIC recording it. I oppose the proposal. -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
