Is there any data indicating: a) the number of legacy resources currently in use (as in, visible in the global table), but not yet claimed through this process b) the number of legacy resource claims that have been attempted but not successfully justified
I am aware that this has remained a topic of concern for a number of APNIC members and technical engineers, and many have been working with APNIC to try and resolve resource allocations with various degrees of success. Andrew On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 09:36, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via sig-policy < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sunny, all, > > > > Just summited a new proposal version amending the editorial inputs and > also adding the following text: > > “Furthermore, from 1st January 2023, all historical resources need to be > maintained in a current APNIC account. In the event of an account closure, > the historical resource will be placed in a quarantine period and then > made available for re-delegation similar to current resources.” > > > > Also, in order to facilitate the job, I agree that will be safer to move > to a single option with 12 months, so I’ve deleted the “2 choices” in the > new version. > > > > > > Regards, > > Jordi > > @jordipalet > > > > > > > > El 23/8/22, 6:51, "Srinivas (Sunny) Chendi" <[email protected]> escribió: > > > > Hi all, > > This is the secretariat's impact assessment for prop-147-v001, which is > also > available on the proposal page. > > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-147 > > APNIC understands that this proposal suggests that historical IPv4 > resources be justified and claimed, or that they be made available to other > organizations that require them. > > APNIC also notes the deletion of Section 4.2.1. Recovery of unused > historical resources. As reported to the community at APNIC 50, this may no > longer be applicable once the project is completed, possibly by the end of > 2022. > > > https://conference.apnic.net/50/assets/files/APCS790/Reclaiming-unused-IPv4.pdf > > *Recommendations:* > > For consistency of language and to align with the current policy document, > the reference to "available pool" could be changed to "free pool". Also the > reference to "original resource holder" and "original custodians" could be > changed to "custodian/s". > > Given the number of uncontactable resource holders, the 12-month option > would be safer for APNIC to implement, as some historical resource holders > may not be aware of the changes to the treatment of historical resources > until they are placed into reserved status on January 1, 2023. > > *Clarification:* > > This proposal only addresses historical resources that have not been > claimed by January 1st, 2023. It does not specify what happens to the > historical resources that are claimed, but the Member or Non-Member account > is not renewed after January 1, 2023. These resources will be considered > historical and may remain in reserve status indefinitely. > > Regards, > Sunny > APNIC Secretariat > > On 11/08/2022 4:59 pm, chku wrote: > > Dear SIG members, > > > > The proposal "prop-147: Historical Resources Management" has been > > sent to the Policy SIG for review. > > > > It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting (OPM) at APNIC 54 on > > Thursday, 15 September 2022. > > > > https://conference.apnic.net/54/program/schedule/#/day/8 > > > > We invite you to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list > > before the OPM. > > > > The comment period on the mailing list before the OPM is an important > > part of the Policy Development Process (PDP). We encourage you to > > express your views on the proposal: > > > > - Do you support or oppose this proposal? > > - Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so, > > tell the community about your situation. > > - Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal? > > - Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear? > > - What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective? > > > > Information about this proposal is appended below as well as available at: > > > > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-147 > > > > Regards, > > Bertrand, Shaila, and Ching-Heng > > APNIC Policy SIG Chairs > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > prop-147-v001: Historical Resources Management > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Proposer: Jordi Palet Martinez ([email protected]) > > Anupam Agrawal ([email protected]) > > > > > > 1. Problem statement > > -------------------- > > Section 4.2.1 is outdated and only looking for very old non-routed resources. > > > > The recent EC resolution (22nd February 2022), imply that historical resource > holders in the APNIC region would need to become Members or Non-Members by > 1st January 2023 in order to receive registration services. Failing this, > historical resource registration will no longer be published in the APNIC > Whois Database and said resources will be placed into reserved status. > > > > Given the continued need for IPv4 addresses, it would seem illogical to keep > these unused historical resources in reserve indefinitely. Alternatively, > these resources can be used in a way that is sufficiently justified in > accordance with existing policies, allowing other organizations to benefit > from them during the IPv6 transition. > > > > > > 2. Objective of policy change > > ----------------------------- > > Ensure that historical IPv4 resources are justified and claimed, or that they > are available for other organizations that require them. > > > > If the resources are marked as reserved, the original holders may reclaim > them with a valid justification, when APNIC failed to contact them for > whatever reason. > > > > One example of a valid justification is the case where an organization is > actually using them internally and there are valid reasons to instead use > RFC1918 space, however the space is not routed. > > > > To give the original resource holders more time to reclaim them, we propose > two time-frames for the community discussion and consideration: 6 months and > 12 months. > > > > > > 3. Situation in other regions > > ----------------------------- > > In other RIRs legacy resources lose their legacy status when the RSA is > signed (upon receiving other resources), so they become under the regular > monitoring. In other cases, there is nothing specified by policies. > > > > > > 4. Proposed policy solution > > --------------------------- > > Proposed policy solution (option 6-months): > > > > Actual text: > > 4.2.1. Recovery of unused historical resources (remove) > > To recover these globally un-routed resources and place them back in the free > pool for re-delegation, APNIC will contact networks responsible for > historical address space in the APNIC region that has not been globally > routed since 1 January 1998. > > > > To recover un-routed historical AS numbers, APNIC will contact networks > responsible for resources not globally used for a reasonable period of time. > > > > Proposed text: > > 4.3. Historical Resources Management > > Historical resources that have not been claimed by the original resource > holder will be deleted from the APNIC Whois database after 1st January 2023, > and marked as reserved. > > > > Historical resources marked as reserved have an additional six (6) months to > be claimed by their original custodians. After that, APNIC will add these > resources to the available pool for re-delegation. > > > > Proposed policy solution (option 12-months): > > Actual text: > > 4.2.1. Recovery of unused historical resources (remove) > > To recover these globally un-routed resources and place them back in the free > pool for re-delegation, APNIC will contact networks responsible for > historical address space in the APNIC region that has not been globally > routed since 1 January 1998. > > > > To recover un-routed historical AS numbers, APNIC will contact networks > responsible for resources not globally used for a reasonable period of time. > > > > Proposed text: > > 4.3. Historical Resources Management > > Historical resources that have not been claimed by the original resource > holder will be deleted from the APNIC Whois database after 1st January 2023, > and marked as reserved. > > > > Historical resources marked as reserved have an additional twelve (12) months > to be claimed by their original custodians. After that, APNIC will add these > resources to the available pool for re-delegation. > > > > > > 5. Advantages / Disadvantages > > ----------------------------- > > Advantages: > > Fulfilling the objective above indicated. > > > > Disadvantages: > > None. > > > > > > 6. Impact on resource holders > > ----------------------------- > > None. > > > > > > 7. References > > ------------- > > None. > > _______________________________________________ > > sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > > > Srinivas (Sunny) Chendi (he/him) > > Senior Advisor - Policy and Community Development > > > > Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) | Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 > > PO Box 3646 South Brisbane, QLD 4101 Australia | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 > > 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD | http://www.apnic.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > > > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) > > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all > > copies of the original message. > > > > _______________________________________________ sig-policy - > https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send > an email to [email protected] > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of > the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or > use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
