skipping the other bits.. If there is not a direct link from an LIR to a customer, then is not a > direct connectivity. So, in that case is not tied to a connectivity service. > > >
I have a simple question, is this an example of leasing or not? 103.93.157.0/25 allocated to an entity with 2 ASNs (AS149847 and AS136594) but it is announced by AS32787. The original entite ASNs are not in the path at all. 103.93.157.0/24* and 103.114.130.0/24* apnic|AU|ipv4|103.93.156.0|512|20170523|allocated|A91A0031 apnic|AU|ipv4|103.114.130.0|512|20180427|assigned|A91A0031 apnic|AU|asn|149847|1|20220526|allocated|A91A0031 apnic|AU|asn|136594|1|20170523|allocated|A91A0031 N*> 103.93.157.0/24 169.254.169.254 50 0 64515 65534 20473 *32787* i N*> 103.114.130.0/24 169.254.169.254 50 0 64515 65534 20473 *32787* i Answer to this question is important because you are mixing business and operational practices.
_______________________________________________ sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
