> My problem still lies with the community not accepting prefixes longer than a > /24 for global routability. We can't prevent IXPs with prefixes longer than a > /24 from routing their prefixes, when those with shorter than or equal to a > /24 can. It's either all can, or none can.
My problem is with the whole idea that RIRs should be issuing IPv4 prefixes longer than /24 in a misguided effort to extend the “useful” life of IPv4. >> RIRs should not be in the business of dictating routing policy to anyone. > > APNIC does not "dictate" how we can and cannot route resources, the community > defines policy (see the PDP). APNIC simply facilitates this process. Permit me to rephrase… Routing Policy should be out of scope for RIR policies. Owen _______________________________________________ SIG-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
