Leave aside for a moment what is seen by specific social and economic groups as the lunatic fringe elements described as Anarchists. Leave aside the Marxian analysis. Without going into serious detail on a meeting- and communication-heavy day at work, I put to you the case that the nation states are willing themselves out of existence. Think WTO, EU, ASEAN, ad nauseam ad infinitum.
Who are we to interfere with this euthanasia?
No shuriken, BTW, just puzzlement at a view being expressed which I thought had died out of serious consideration in the first half of the previous century, if not the second half of the one before. Nothing personal, Radhika.
Udhay Shankar N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Udhay Shankar N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indrajit Gupta wrote: [ on 10:15 AM 2/23/2006 ]
>I am completely bewildered. Why would anyone want to keep alive the
>idea of the nation state? Are you serious?
On the offchance that you're serious (shuriken?) -
Leaving aside for the moment the issue of "Why would anyone want to
keep alive the idea of the nation state", it would seem to be
inarguable that there *do* exist various parties who *do* want to do
precisely this.
In this context, Radhika's comment makes sense, to me at least.
Udhay
>"Radhika, Y." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>absolutely...how can you keep alive the idea of the nation state
>without teaching the young about the struggle and the idea of invasion
>whether by trade or military? Here i am not casting a value judgement
>on whether that is good or bad but am merely arguing that history has
>a political agenda as well as other agendas.
--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
Indrajit Gupta
'Ramsharan', 396, TT Krishnamachari Road,
Teynampet,
Chennai 600 018.
+914455511138
+919884375777
Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.
