On 05-Aug-06, at 2:09 PM, sastry wrote:
With respect and without intending to hurt I would classify this as
a very
naive, very short term view.
And, I notice, without assigning any reason either.
Sorry. What you think is wrong because you have simplified the
problem to fit
what you think you know rather than what is actually known
Really, I could say similar things about your viewpoint, but argument
ad hominem
is not within the accepted norms of this list, and also not my
preferred mode of
debate.
I do believe it is "actually known" that modern medical care (and
health information
from books, the 'Net. etc.) gives human beings a huge survival edge
that isn't
available to those who don't have access to these things.
Cheers
#!
