On Sat August 5 2006 6:58 pm, Ashish Gulhati wrote: > > Sorry. What you think is wrong because you have simplified the > > problem to fit > > what you think you know rather than what is actually known > > Really, I could say similar things about your viewpoint, but argument > ad hominem > is not within the accepted norms of this list, and also not my > preferred mode of > debate.
My apologies - but my frank opinion is that you really do not know what you are talking about. We need to start a new thread and talk about what is genetic about diabetes and heart disease and how the population profile may be changing and how we do not know the consequences of that may be. I am willing to take the discussion further - but my disagreeing with you entirely has become "ad hominem" to you. Since you bring up the word ad hominem - I beg to disagree with that too. If I said what I really think - I would say that you are bullshitting. That is going towards ad hominen. Sorry. shiv
