At 2007-07-13 15:27:46 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > You don't have to accept a possibly concocted story as historical fact > just because a character in a story is named after a town.
I thought you were saying that the town was named after the character in the story: "Modern day Kandahar in Afghanistan has a name derived from Gandhari, after a girl from a Kingdom in that area who married Dhritarashtra". -- ams
