And also Eco's _Foucault's Pendulum_, at the risk
of offending Rishab. :) I started that book at
least 3 times before giving up for good.

but the interesting thing about Foucault's Pendulum is that it is
interleaved with passages of  amazing lucidity.
for example, if you have a copy handy, you can try looking at section
63. titled "What does the fish remind you of?". this section is under
the chapter Gevurah. in my cheap paperback edition its page 299.
in this section Lia, the narrator's girlfriend confronts him with his
growing obsession with secret numbers and their supposed deep
significance and proceeds to 'solve' the puzzle for him by turning his
gaze to the 'cosmology' of her own body (she is pregnant with their
kid) and its simple but profound rhythms and patterns.

also,
section 63 starts with a quote from Heller's Catch 22
"What does the fish remind you of?"
"Other fish."
'And what does other fish remind you of?"
"Other fish".




On 7/22/07, Udhay Shankar N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ramakrishnan Sundaram wrote: [ on 12:10 AM 7/22/2007 ]

> > you'e trying to say. And I say this as someone who has struggled his way
> > through the EPW, texts by Félix Guattari, and IBM technical manuals.
>
>Please sir, please sir, can I add Finnegan's Wake to the list?

And also Eco's _Foucault's Pendulum_, at the risk
of offending Rishab. :) I started that book at
least 3 times before giving up for good.

But the most amazingly opaque thing I have ever
read is Guattari's _Molecular Revolution_, which
turned a string of purportedly English words into
completely incomprehensible ciphertext. As a crypto manqué, I can only applaud.

I got rid of the book as soon as I decently
could, byt gifting it to Herr Doktor Kelty - on
the reasoning that he ought to be immune to its effects by now [1].

Udhay

[1] http://groups.yahoo.com/group/silk-list/message/12267


--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))





--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
does the frog know it has a latin name?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Reply via email to