On Nov 16, 2007 9:39 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 2007-11-16 09:52:47 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > (regarding "polichathu" vs. pollichathu") > > > > There isn't any > > Three-l lllama. > > There isn't a three-l polllichathu either, but there's a 1-U > (non-rackmountable) version of the 1-l word (i.e. pulichathu) > that also means something different (sour/soured).
Surely you mean a 2-U version? :-) -- b
