On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 16:26 -0700, Thaths wrote: > *ahem* *mumble*top post*mumble*
hehe you can mumble all you want, but i posit that although i technically made a top post in one sense of the term (quoting the text to which i was responding after my own response) it was not in the sense that is disapproved of. i actually excerpted 5 lines from a 20-line post by shyam, and posted my 5-line response directly above only that excerpt :-) you on the other hand did not post "on top" but inserted 1 line into the entire quoted 10-line text of my mail including shyam's quote. which wasted more bandwidth :-) (shyam's post which i excerpted, though, _was_ a top-post... he added his 20-line text to the top of the _entire_ 48-line article posted by deepa.) -rishab, who uses wc, and types in lower case since typing blind 16 years ago on a 1200 bps modem with 4 second lag meant not worrying about case changes.
