I'd stick with my PF (I hope they never annuitize *that*!), and handle my market-linked investments on my own. PF + NPS is too skewed, somehow.
NPS might make sense if you don't have a PF account (though I still wouldn't have taken it). Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone -----Original Message----- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <sur...@hserus.net> Sender: "silklist" <silklist-bounces+thewall=gmail....@lists.hserus.net>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:45:47 To: <silklist@lists.hserus.net> Reply-To: silklist@lists.hserus.net Subject: Re: [silk] PFRDA and Security thew...@gmail.com [18/06/13 10:25 +0000]: >But, PF withdrawals are tax free after some reasonable conditions are >fulfilled- 5 years service, etc. Note - moneylife - while pointing out what I did - has a contrarian view on NPS - http://www.moneylife.in/article/retirement-planning-why-you-should-avoid-the-new-pension-system/30925.html
