Reid PPM is not reported as .006 PPM in any of the reading I have done.
Perhaps you should go back to the library that I was told to go to and get your facts straight. If you could prove to me that the particle size is .00001 after having been tested by a top quality lab I would be tickled pink, but I don't think you can. By the way, what are your credentials. Was it you or someone else that had suggestions on the books I should read, so far I haven't seen any mentioned. Beverley At 11:12 PM 1/30/97 GMT, you wrote: >>Perhaps you should get your information straight. You are right that a >>permanent discoloration of the skin called Argyria can occur is too much >>silver is ingested. What you should be going after are the companies >>that produce Colloidal Silver with a particle size that is larger than .001 >>microns. Colloidal Silver properly produced with a particle size of .001 >>or less is perfectly safe to take. This particle size is small enough >>that it will sluff itself out of the body. > >>The other area that your organization should be attacking, if you really >>are out to save the world against "Health Fraud", are the machines that are >>going sold to home manufacture Colloidal Silver. >>These machines are the "killers" in this Colloidal Silver controversy not >>the "good" properly manufactured Colloidal Silver on the market. > > > I think your still missing the point. The CS that is made today is >made with electricity. That's .00001 astrons break off partical size using >electricity. A company would have to be out of their minds to try any >other way. > > So far what I've found is PPM lower than what was advertized. Insted >of getting 5 ppm the person was getting .006 ppm (not partical size ppm.) > > >Reid > > > > > >
