At 05:05 AM 1/31/97 GMT, you wrote: >>PPM is not reported as .006 PPM in any of the reading I have done. > > So how many PPM tests have you ran? I have one right here in front >of me. It's not the one that says .006 but it's one of about 3
Lets have the one that is .006, if you have one !!! . Look >at it this way, 5 ppm means that there 5 parts of silver per million >parts of water. Less than 1 part per millon would be measured in .??? >PPM. What are you trying to prove, so you have a report on some CS that is 3 PPM. In my humble opinion, it's garbage. I don't use that kind of CS what point are you trying to make. My CS is between 5 - 10 PPM, so you are making or using CS that is of no good, what is your point. > Here's a Snip from a friends lab test of her own device. She was making >the mistake of letting the rods touch the bottom of the glass. >>Test results were pitiful, although safe from nickel. >>Nickel: BDL (below detectable level, minimum dectectable level(MDL) is >>.01 ppm and nickel content in drinking water is not regulated as it is >>not toxic in low levels. >>Silver: BDL: 0.12 ppm!!!, MDL is .02 ppm, so this one at least made the >>min. level, but a far cry from 5ppm! Does your friend work for a credible lab? Not interested unless she has credentials or is working for a credible lab. How do I know that she knows what she is doing. >Do you see the .02 PPM? Is that enough to prove you wrong or do you need more? >>Perhaps you should go back to the library that I was told to go to and get >>your facts straight. Perhaps your friend does not know what she is talking about !!!! > Like I said before don't need to, been there and done that. >>If you could prove to me that the particle size is .00001 after having been >>tested by a top quality lab I would be tickled pink, but I don't think you >>can. > I had that #...@$!@ lab report here the other day and I can't find it now. I >don't have the time to stop and look for it now (school, work, and rest). You >can take my word for it or you can call this number and ask them if I ran the >tests 618-997-9200. Your works is not worth the paper it's printed on in my humble opinion. Convenient that you have just lost it. i will not make any long distance phone calls, you make the call can report to this list what is said. You are the one with the point to prove not me, I have already made my point and the fact that you have come up with nothing more but nonsense proves that you do not know what you are talking about. >>By the way, what are your credentials. If you had been seeing the posts that you have been reading and answering you would see that I have no credentials. I don't need credentials to report what I know from my reading and from the knowledgable people that I deal with. For the millionth time WHAT ARE YOUR CREDENTIALS !!!! > Lyme victiom with two heart attacks to show for it. I know 90% more >than most doctors do about the disease. As a matter of a fact the last >visit to my doctor he said quote "What do you think? I'm learning from you!" >end quote! When you have to fight for your life you read every thing you can >get your hands on about the disease and the medicine that your taking! >Besides that I'm working my bachelors in CIS (Computer Information Systems). >I'm writting a background paper now so I can test out of some of the classes. >My goal is a four year degree in 2 years. Of corse that doesn't count the >12 years computer experience. That gives you not more credentials in the area of CS than I have -- so big deal, you are a sick person, I am not but that still doesn't mean I don't know what I am talking about. >>Was it you or someone else that had suggestions on the books I should read, >>so far I haven't seen any mentioned. > Here's a start, there are many many others and references from those. > >1984 Harvard study >Encyclopedia Britanica, 1910 >Health Consciousness Magazine, vol. 15, no. 4 >Dr. Henry Crooks >Dr. Robert Becker, "The Body Electric," >Science Digest, March 1978. >Dr. Bjorn Nordstrom, of the Karolinska Institute, Sweden >British Medical Journal, Feb 1923 >Provo Herald, 13 February 1992 >American Drug Index, section on Inorganic Pharmaceutical Chemistry, recogni >The Condensed Medical Dictionary, 6th Edition >Medicinal Silver Home Remedies, Maurice Worthington, M.D., 1928. >British Medical Jour 1932. Gee Reid, guess you read them cover to cover with all your spare time < VBG > Thanks, I'll turn the list over to my friend. Beverley
