Gary I want you to read the post I just received from one of your wonderful list members, don't ask me how it got through. It was something I did last week on the laptop and never sent.
I think that perhaps you should have some words with the wonderful scientic people that think theirs doesn't !!! If your "Jack" is scientific he would know what I wrote is accurate !!!! Glad his name is Jack, that is my least favourate name in the whole world. At 09:55 PM 2/2/97 -0800, you wrote: >At 06:33 PM 2/2/97 -0800, you wrote: >>At 05:05 AM 1/31/97 GMT, you wrote: >>>>PPM is not reported as .006 PPM in any of the reading I have done. >>> >>> So how many PPM tests have you ran? I have one right here in front >>>of me. It's not the one that says .006 but it's one of about 3 >> >>Lets have the one that is .006, if you have one !!! > >How did you get back on this Email group? You must get up every morning and >OD on ugly pills. Perhaps if you gave your half-a-brain a rest you would be >thoughtless. Boy, do I feel good doing this. I look forward to your >retarded, imbecilic, mispelled, egregious, comments. Us scientists need >people like you to remind us of the value of education. Well, think hard >when you draft your answer. Maybe you need to get stablized on lithium >before replying. > >Keep the faith, and if that doesn't work, waste 'em all. > >Jack > > > "Quieta movere magna merces videbatur." Sallust c.78-c.26 B.C. (Just to stir things up seemed a great reward in itself) Beverley Abramson
