Why am I not surprised to hear that!
N.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dee" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: CS>blue moons revisited
With silver being so sensitive to *any* contaminants, I would have thought
it would show some colour change or something, if something had become
contaminated within it. Would not the taste change? I gave some three
year old silver (a bit cruddy) to someone who had never used it and was a
sceptic, but she had been to the doctors for two months with raging
diarrhoea and sickness, and she drank the whole 250mls out of desperation.
Hey presto, she was cured and is now a silver fan. Obviously this was
just as efficaceous as any made recently. To me, this is 'proof' enough,
as it was in a clear bottle and just chucked on a shelf somewhere for the
three years. dee
Indi wrote:
We seem to be on different pages here. When you speak in absolutes, I
tend to take it literally. Now I understand,
you speak in absolutes but are "taking a lot on faith". That's fine for
you, but IMO it is irresponsible to broadcast "EIS unchanges after five
years"
armed with only an EC meter and a laser pointer, for the simple reason
that those devices are not enough to *prove* your claims (in scientific
terms).
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
