At 09:41 AM 10/18/2008 -0400, you wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 09:27:55AM -0400, Faith Gagne wrote:
> Dear N.
>
> I don't use anything to 'measure' the CS I use. I'd like to have
> something for this purpose. I think Ode sells a meter of some sort.
> Faith G.
>
Ah, interesting. :)
## Why is that "interesting" ?
I don't recall anyone accusing me of being a "salesman".....I suck at it.
I also post the straight skinny on what they do and don't do and their
limitations.
In other words, I have meters available, but I don't "sell" them.
In fact, I talk myself out of sales more often than not. 'The best wrong
tool we have'
I actually don't care about shipping meters as then I have to field a lot
of misinterpretations when people misunderstand the instructions and expect
things they can't give them.
..just as much a pain as a profit. [and the lowest markup on the net on the
COM-100 at that...the prez of HM Digital actually complained about it once
insisting that I say they were introductory prices...then he figured out
how few I buy , no big deal and also no listing as a distributor. ]
Everything you need except a jar and water.
Accessories
Stuff that's useful, but you don't "need" to make CS as inferred by the
above.
EC meters can be very good for making *comparisons* if you understand
what they do, don't do and how they can be fooled.
For telling what an unknown is.."ballpark" within limits. [or TDS
meter...somewhere in the parking lot of the ball park, maybe on the diamond
, maybe a half block away...but it beats not being in town at all ]
....better than most Hanna TDSs, some of which are trash.
Ode
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neville" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 9:15 AM
> Subject: Re: CS>blue moons revisited
>
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Indi" <[email protected]>
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 2:53 AM
>> Subject: Re: CS>blue moons revisited
>>
>>
>> Quote:
>> [armed with only an EC meter and a laser pointer, for the simple reason
>> that those devices are not enough to *prove* your claims (in scientific
>> terms).]
>>
>> In the absence of suitable laboratory testing equipment, in the home,
>> which is where most users involved with EICS are, perhaps you could
>> steer me in the direction of a more accurate, better or more suitable
>> instrument so that I may be able to assess my EICS in a more acceptable
>> and precise manner. I for one would certainly be most grateful in the
>> knowledge that there are other instruments available, other than EC
>> meters etc, which are available and affordable over the counter to
>> everyone in their homes, but I don't know what is available to me,
>> other than the instrument I currently use. If you know something I
>> don't then I would be humbly grateful if you would pass it on, but it
>> must be affordable and available over the counter to everyone who is
>> involved with EICS..........in their own homes.
>>
>> It's fine for those who may be scientifically minded and/or have access
>> to more precise instruments, but I think most EICS users are just plain
>> ordinary folk using equipment that is affordable and readily available.
>> Tell me what else I can use that fits the above criteria and I'll go
>> out and get one, but remember, it must fit the above criteria so that
>> perhaps we can all go out and get one.
>>
>> N.
>>
>> --
>> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>>
>> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
>>
>> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
>>
>> Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
>>
>> The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
>>
>> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>>
>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.1/1732 - Release Date: 10/18/2008
6:01 PM
