You're quite right Dee, with a correction if I may, ionic silver is NOT, quote: "...arguably *more* efficacious" or "...it is just *as* efficacious" end quotes, it IS the ions that do most of the 'work'. Pick up any reputable book or seek out appropriate published literature on the subject and one will get an understanding of 'which' does 'what' and 'how' and 'why'.
Those who suggest particles are the 'in thing' while bagging out ions is just plain BS aimed at those who are mostly misguided and/or have read little. And all marketers are out there hustling to make a quid off those souls who are not well read. Particles have a place, and do a 'job' also, but it's the positively charged silver ions that are the most important for most circumstances. N. > Subject: Re: CS>Can someone answer this question? > From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:31:54 +0000 > To: [email protected] > > It is unfortunate that there are sites like this giving out misinformation. > Ionic silver is arguably *more* efficacious than colloidal silver - but in > any case it is just *as* efficacious. dee > > On 26 Mar 2010, at 16:02, Kathy wrote: > > > > > http://www.thetreeofliberty.com/vb/showthread.php?t=97212 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> > > _________________________________________________________________ Link all your email accounts and social updates with Hotmail. Find out now. http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/oneinbox?ocid=T162MSN05A0710G
