I know this Neville, and Steve posted a really good article which explained just why this is so, and what the functions of both sorts of silver were. But .... a lot of people don't believe this - for whatever reason. dee
On 26 Mar 2010, at 23:28, Neville Munn wrote: > You're quite right Dee, with a correction if I may, ionic silver is NOT, > quote: "...arguably *more* efficacious" or "...it is just *as* efficacious" > end quotes, it IS the ions that do most of the 'work'. > > Pick up any reputable book or seek out appropriate published literature on > the subject and one will get an understanding of 'which' does 'what' and > 'how' and 'why'. > > Those who suggest particles are the 'in thing' while bagging out ions is just > plain BS aimed at those who are mostly misguided and/or have read little. > And all marketers are out there hustling to make a quid off those souls who > are not well read. > > Particles have a place, and do a 'job' also, but it's the positively charged > silver ions that are the most important for most circumstances. > > N. > -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
