Marshall, Bob et al

Iam from Costa Rica, and I was infected here.... if your theory is correct is there any simple way I can know if the treatment will work for me? It is the first time I hear about "Benzene"...

Thanks

Alex

On 02/22/2013 02:51 PM, bob Larson wrote:
...i have read some mention of the USA being so full of pollutants that treatments don't work as well... those in africa, south america, and other less "developed" places have populations not immersed in all that doing much better. i haven't run into this Benzene root notion except maybe once so i forget.... do you have any links to good reading re the Benzene problem?

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* Marshall [mailto:[email protected]]
    *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2013 12:17 PM
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* Re: CS>hiv testimonial - CS did not work for me.

    On 2/22/2013 12:00 PM, bob Larson wrote:
    ...i read/followed the MMS scene for a couple years since it's
    onset.  i bought enough bulk powder to make lots of little
    bottles, and used it with & without CS experinenting  on my hepC.
    the stuff is vile, and for most there comes a time when it is too
    repulsive to take down.
    i read many HIV/AIDS failures and zero successes in local
    groups.  all the stories of MMS, zappers, beck protocol,
    Ag4O4,rife,... etc in africa and other places seem to have much
    better luck than here in the USA.  go figger.

    That is exactly what I would expect if my reading on it is
    correct.  AIDs in Africa is caused by parasites, which MMS kills
    allowing recovery,  most in the IS is from benzene exposure, in
    which CS, Zapper and MMS will do nothing for.  In both cases it
    appears the the HIV virus is not a cause of AIDS but rather an
    indicator that the immune system is deficient for whatever
    reason.  From what I have read virtually 100% of the people in the
    US have the virus, but only those with AIDS have a count high
    enough to not be ignored.

    HIV counts are a good way to monitor the situation, but going
    after the HIV is only going after the monitor, not the cause. It
    is like having a fire making a lot of smoke, and ignoring the
    fire, and only trying to dissipate the smoke.  The smoke is an
    indicator, not the cause.

    I could be wrong on this, but from all I have read over the years
    that is the conclusion I have drawn as it seems to be the only
    hypothesis that fits all the data.

    Marshall