Realize that AIDS is a symptom, which can be caused by a lot of things. ANYTHING that kills your immune system can cause AIDS. They test for HIV which is somewhat reliable since this virus will bloom significantly when the immune system is compromised. In Africa most of the immune system impairment comes from parasites. That does not mean other things cannot cause it, but things like benzene are fairly rare.

HPV also appears to be a possible cause or contributing factor for AIDS. 77% of those with elevated HIV counts also have HPV.

But to answer you question, the blood likely contains a number of agents, maybe some chemicals such as benzene, but also viruses such as HPV. For hemophiliacs Factor VIII blood clotting treatment also suppresses the immune system. The assault can then lead to the destruction of the immune system.

Specifically in blood transfusions http://www.aliveandwell.org/html/if_its_not/ifitsnothiv.html

Transfusion Recipients and Hemophiliacs

Hemophiliacs and blood transfusion recipients together make up 2% of adult AIDS cases in the US. As noted previously, Factor VIII, the blood clotting treatment used by hemophiliacs, is itself immune suppressive. Hemophilia is a life-threatening condition in people with or without an HIV positive diagnosis. Ryan White, the young HIV positive hemophiliac who became famous as an AIDS victim, actually died of common complications attributed to hemophilia (internal bleeding and liver failure), not of illnesses that define AIDS.223

Blood transfusions suppress the immune system. Medical experts note that higher amounts of blood transfusions among hospitalized patients correlate with higher death rates. The authors of one recent study on transfusions specifically mention that the immune suppressive effects of transfusions leave recipients vulnerable to deadly opportunistic infection.224

Factor VIII and blood transfusions can cause positive results on HIV antibody tests in persons never exposed to HIV by triggering the production of antibodies that react with the nonspecific proteins used in the HIV antibody test. Once a person has tested positive, they are subject to immune suppressive drug treatment regimens, and the terror of developing AIDS.

Members of these risk groups can be more accurately described as people with serious preexisting health challenges, critical or chronic exposure to immune suppressive blood products and toxic AIDS drugs, and/or who are affected by the chronic despair of a fatal diagnosis. Based on this view, immune compromising anti-HIV chemotherapy and continuous antibiotic treatments would compound preexisting health problems, rather than resolve them.

Marshall



On 2/22/2013 11:52 PM, Dan Nave wrote:
How then do you account for transmission of the disease from blood?

Dan

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Marshall<[email protected]>  wrote:
On 2/22/2013 12:00 PM, bob Larson wrote:

...i read/followed the MMS scene for a couple years since it's onset.  i
bought enough bulk powder to make lots of little bottles, and used it with&
without CS experinenting  on my hepC.
the stuff is vile, and for most there comes a time when it is too repulsive
to take down.
i read many HIV/AIDS failures and zero successes in local groups.  all the
stories of MMS, zappers, beck protocol, Ag4O4,rife,... etc in africa and
other places seem to have much better luck than here in the USA.  go figger.

That is exactly what I would expect if my reading on it is correct.  AIDs in
Africa is caused by parasites, which MMS kills allowing recovery,  most in
the IS is from benzene exposure, in which CS, Zapper and MMS will do nothing
for.  In both cases it appears the the HIV virus is not a cause of AIDS but
rather an indicator that the immune system is deficient for whatever reason.
 From what I have read virtually 100% of the people in the US have the virus,
but only those with AIDS have a count high enough to not be ignored.

HIV counts are a good way to monitor the situation, but going after the HIV
is only going after the monitor, not the cause. It is like having a fire
making a lot of smoke, and ignoring the fire, and only trying to dissipate
the smoke.  The smoke is an indicator, not the cause.

I could be wrong on this, but from all I have read over the years that is
the conclusion I have drawn as it seems to be the only hypothesis that fits
all the data.

Marshall

--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
   Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
   <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions:<mailto:[email protected]>
List Owner: Mike Devour<mailto:[email protected]>





-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1430 / Virus Database: 2639/5624 - Release Date: 02/22/13