Hi Alan There have been more then 20 million bottles of MMS used since it was started in the year 2000 and there are no records of people being harmed if they follow the instructions properly..Nothing is perfect..As you are aware..there are a number of people who have been planted on these lists by Big pharmacy and the medical Cartel to disrupt and make problems for members..These people are easy to spot as they all have the same negative attitude..They don’t realize that each year in america there are close to a million people who die from approved Pharmaceutical Drugs..Also Doctors are the # 1 killer of people and they can do it legally with no problems..They are not hard to spot on this list so it important to keep an open mind..How do they sleep at night... They need to do honest research but in these cases it won’t work as they have a hidden agenda..Colloidal Silver, MMS, Oxygen therapy, DMSO, and many others are good protocols.and deserve to be appreciated..Ebola is coming and it is not going to be nice. DEE lets give these protocols a chance as we are going to need them.. AJR
From: Alan Faulkner Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2014 6:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>MMS and "Church" I have never heard of anyone having an extremely bad reaction to MMS. Your body gets sick for a variety of reasons or as Nelson Bradley suggests, for 5 reasons; toxins, diet, psychological, pathogen, electrical disruption, skeletal issues. In order to straighten the body out, often "stuff" has to be offloaded. The process of offloading it may be unpleasant, but to blame it on something or someone is to be a fool. Often MMS will cause a very brief case of diarrhea (as in my case about 5 minutes) which is simply the body's way of offloading the trash you consumed yourself. Happened to me and felt very right and afterwards was a great relief. Whether you off load the 'stuff' through something like Pancha Karma (Ayurveda) or the various herbal mixtures, or MMS or whatever, the idea is that you do have to get rid of stuff occasionally. If you have cancer, it took quite awhile to get to the point where the cancer showed up, so to dump it quickly may not be comfortable. Now having said that some PPL see the MMS protocols and think "hmmmm if a little is good then a lot is better" (typically male) so they consume way too much with predictable results. I doubt that MMS has risks, when used sensibly, because after it kills pathogens it changes into a weak salt and then exits the body. Alan On 2014-11-01, at 02:36 AM, Dee wrote: I think that this probably my thinking Victor because although he has obviously done a lot of good using MMS, in some people the results could be bad, so as you say, I think personally that the risk outweighs the benefits for me. I did know of someone who, a few years ago, insulted me roundly when I voiced a word of caution about MMS, who later almost apologised to me, because he had an extremely bad reaction to it...dee Sent from my iPad On 1 Nov 2014, at 04:47, Victor Cozzetto <[email protected]> wrote: I just noticed that none of my posts about MMS are in the archive; which would explain why nobody was responding to me. (Not sure what the issue is Mike, but luckily I still have all the emails in my outbox). I am not a chemist, but here is my opinion that I have shared with others in the past: I am sure that MMS works for many people, and I do not doubt that it could potentially cure almost anything. However, I cannot recommend it or use it with what I currently know. Of course I am still ignorant, but here are some of the reasons why I would not use it: 1. MMS can be dangerous. It can do direct damage to the body, interact with other chemicals, drugs, etc. It is too unpredictable, and thus the risk is simply too high for me. 2. To my knowledge, MMS cannot do anything that colloidal silver (CS) cannot do, but CS has zero risk, is cheaper, predictable, and is guaranteed to be effective. (of course levels of effectiveness vary, depending on the ailment) 3. MMS can also be compared to ozonated water (because it uses oxidizing effects), but again, the ozonated water has zero risk, is cheaper, more predictable, and is guaranteed to be effective. 4. MMS has the same limitations that both CS and ozonated water have - in that they cannot directly target lymph, nervous systems, etc. However, CS and ozonated water contribute directly to strengthening the immune system, and thus have a direct impact on all health. MMS can potentially achieve this too, but that is not certain, since it can act as a toxin, and thus have the opposite effect. 5. I might sound too harsh, but I would compare MMS more to chemo. It isn't of course, but it is a chemical that can have a toxic effect on the body. It can have a very rapid impact, but I am not sure how good that is, since it is purely a 'killing' action, and does not enhance the body's ability to repair. Both CS and Ozone provide direct 'killing' and greatly enhance the body's ability to defend and repair. 6. I would be afraid to use MMS with other treatments, since is it s chemical that I am not familiar enough with. Thus, I cannot add it to the things I am doing. CS and Ozonated water work great with a variety of other treatments and protocols. 7. Perhaps the greatest single problem - MMS is often cited as causing gut problems for people, and that is not good, since the gut is the heart of our immune system. By contrast, CS has no negative impact on the gut, and is used to treat various gut ailments. (CS is absorbed very rapidly in the gut, and normal consumption of kefir, yogurt, fermented foods, etc. ensure that CS has no negative impact on gut flora). Again, I wouldn't doubt that MMS can save lives in places where no other options are available, but putting that energy into getting CS (or other treatments) is a much better long-term solution IMHO. Victor
