The person I mentioned allowed for Herxeimer (spelling) for a long period but 
became so Ill he had to stop the MMS and eventually recovered...dee

Sent from my iPad

> On 1 Nov 2014, at 21:19, Alan Faulkner <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I have never heard of anyone having an extremely bad reaction to MMS. 
> 
> Your body gets sick for a variety of reasons or as Nelson Bradley suggests, 
> for 5 reasons; toxins, diet, psychological, pathogen, electrical disruption, 
> skeletal issues. In order to straighten the body out, often "stuff" has to be 
> offloaded. The process of offloading it may be unpleasant, but to blame it on 
> something or someone is to be a fool. 
> 
> Often MMS will cause a very brief case of diarrhea (as in my case about 5 
> minutes) which is simply the body's way of offloading the trash you consumed 
> yourself. Happened to me and felt very right and afterwards was a great 
> relief.
> 
> Whether you off load the 'stuff' through something like Pancha Karma 
> (Ayurveda) or the various herbal mixtures, or MMS or whatever, the idea is 
> that you do have to get rid of stuff occasionally. If you have cancer, it 
> took quite awhile to get to the point where the cancer showed up, so to dump 
> it quickly may not be comfortable.
> 
> Now having said that some PPL see the MMS protocols and think "hmmmm if a 
> little is good then a lot is better" (typically male) so they consume way too 
> much with predictable results.
> 
> I doubt that MMS has risks, when used sensibly, because after it kills 
> pathogens it changes into a weak salt and then exits the body.
> 
> Alan
> 
> On 2014-11-01, at 02:36 AM, Dee wrote:
> 
> I think that this probably my thinking Victor because although he has 
> obviously done a lot of good using MMS, in some people the results could be 
> bad, so as you say, I think personally that the risk outweighs the benefits 
> for me.  I did know of someone who, a few years ago, insulted me roundly when 
> I voiced a word of caution about MMS, who later almost apologised to me, 
> because he had an extremely bad reaction to it...dee
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On 1 Nov 2014, at 04:47, Victor Cozzetto <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I just noticed that none of my posts about MMS are in the archive; which 
>> would explain why nobody was responding to me. (Not sure what the issue is 
>> Mike, but luckily I still have all the emails in my outbox).
>> 
>> I am not a chemist, but here is my opinion that I have shared with others in 
>> the past:
>> 
>> I am sure that MMS works for many people, and I do not doubt that it could 
>> potentially cure almost anything. However, I cannot recommend it or use it 
>> with what I currently know. Of course I am still ignorant, but here are some 
>> of the reasons why I would not use it:
>> 
>> 1. MMS can be dangerous. It can do direct damage to the body, interact with 
>> other chemicals, drugs, etc. It is too unpredictable, and thus the risk is 
>> simply too high for me.
>> 
>> 2. To my knowledge, MMS cannot do anything that colloidal silver (CS) cannot 
>> do, but CS has zero risk, is cheaper, predictable, and is guaranteed to be 
>> effective. (of course levels of effectiveness vary, depending on the ailment)
>> 
>> 3. MMS can also be compared to ozonated water (because it uses oxidizing 
>> effects), but again, the ozonated water has zero risk, is cheaper, more 
>> predictable, and is guaranteed to be effective.
>> 
>> 4. MMS has the same limitations that both CS and ozonated water have - in 
>> that they cannot directly target lymph, nervous systems, etc. However, CS 
>> and ozonated water contribute directly to strengthening the immune system, 
>> and thus have a direct impact on all health. MMS can potentially achieve 
>> this too, but that is not certain, since it can act as a toxin, and thus 
>> have the opposite effect.
>> 
>> 5. I might sound too harsh, but I would compare MMS more to chemo. It isn't 
>> of course, but it is a chemical that can have a toxic effect on the body. It 
>> can have a very rapid impact, but I am not sure how good that is, since it 
>> is purely a 'killing' action, and does not enhance the body's ability to 
>> repair. Both CS and Ozone provide direct 'killing' and greatly enhance the 
>> body's ability to defend and repair.
>> 
>> 6. I would be afraid to use MMS with other treatments, since is it s 
>> chemical that I am not familiar enough with. Thus, I cannot add it to the 
>> things I am doing. CS and Ozonated water work great with a variety of other 
>> treatments and protocols.
>> 
>> 7. Perhaps the greatest single problem - MMS is often cited as causing gut 
>> problems for people, and that is not good, since the gut is the heart of our 
>> immune system. By contrast, CS has no negative impact on the gut, and is 
>> used to treat various gut ailments. (CS is absorbed very rapidly in the gut, 
>> and normal consumption of kefir, yogurt, fermented foods, etc. ensure that 
>> CS has no negative impact on gut flora).
>> 
>> Again, I wouldn't doubt that MMS can save lives in places where no other 
>> options are available, but putting that energy into getting CS (or other 
>> treatments) is a much better long-term solution IMHO.
>> 
>> Victor
>