As stated, the likelihood that ancient salt has absorbed greater than normal amounts of localized mineral content, making it an unbalanced product which may or may not be good for your health. (i.e., high arsenic content)
----- Original Message ----- From: "John A. Stanley" <[email protected]> Newsgroups: list.silver To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:03 AM Subject: Re: CS>OT -- Sea salt... > In article <003701c24cfe$11a008a0$3defe...@computer>, > Bill Missett <[email protected]> wrote: > > >You want to avoid mined salt, which is sometimes ancient and contains > >heavier amounts of local trace elements, and stay with the fresh, > >ocean-harvested sea salt. > > RealSalt is a widely available mined salt. It's basically just seasalt > from an ancient sea. What is it that you find objectionable about its > analysis? > > http://www.realsalt.com/prodinfo.html > > Detailed analysis in PDF format: > > http://www.realsalt.com/images/analysis.pdf > > And, check out this analysis of Celtic salt: > > http://www.celtic-seasalt.com/celseasalan.html > > It looks like RealSalt has less non-NaCl content than the Celtic salt. > > -- > John A. Stanley [email protected] > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> >
