url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60367.html Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux From: Jonathan B. Britten Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:26:27
> The information below is very interesting indeed. However, I can > not help but wonder whether the apparently higher efficacy of the > new-method CS was in fact merely coincidental, a result of the new > CS being taken at a time when the virus was vulnerable, and > further at a time following the use of "ordinary" CS which had > rendered the virus much weaker. > From the information provided, it seems difficult to exclude this > possibility. If there is a way to exclude this interpretation, it > would be good to know. > JBB Hi Jonathan, I am not an doctor, and know little about medicine. But I am an engineer, and I know a lot about making accurate measurements. I can confirm the current used to make the cs was constant to within +/-2.5%, depending on the line voltage. I can confirm the brew time was accurate to within several seconds, depending on what my hands were doing when the timer went off. I can confirm the fill level was constant to within 1/8 of an inch. The dw was from Walmart. Not the best quality, but very consistent. I measured the initial voltage for most runs just to verify the quality, and plotted the cv curve when I had time. There is no reason to expect much variation in the cs. I made 8 oz each day. This was a religion. Nothing else happened until the timer went off and I drank the cs, and my normal morning coffee. The Shingles attack was in October, 2001. The normal cs killed it very quickly. A low-level infection returned this January. It was in the same general location, but a bit lower down. I made no change in my procedure of making cs, except to try stirring. It did not work, the Shingles got worse, and I went back to the normal cs. The Shingles returned to its previous level. Perhaps three weeks transpired, and things were pretty much the same as before. Taking a shower produced the same level of pain. I got the idea to try to make a 9V generator, and posted the goal to the list. I got my first results on Monday, and posted to the list. The response to the new cs was so dramatic and sudden, there is little to account for it except the increased concentration of silver ions. After discovering this, I changed to the new cs and started taking a mouthful every three or four days, instead of drinking 8 oz per day. There have been no tingling sensations indicating the start of a new Shingles infection, no trace of any cold sore infections, no pain from cavities, and the teenager and her mother are completely clear of any new infections. They both had been taking the 1.4 mA/sq. in cs before, but the teenager got a serious infection. This cleared up when I switched to the 87uA/sq. in. cs and put him on a regime of one mouthful every two days. The indications are the same across the board. For all of us who take it, the new cs is much better than the old. Others will have to try it and see how it works. I have posted the necessary information in the ULVDC thread. I am not claiming magic or the phase of the moon. My interpretation of the effect of the density of the ion cloud on the formation of particles is well documented in the archives. An ion is an ion. The more of them, the better. Best Regards, Mike Monett -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
