url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60406.html CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux From: jrowland Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 10:02:32
[...] > I, too, am put off by Mike M.'s claims of "formulatory > superiority" while conveniently refusing Ole Bob's offer of a free > analysis. > Why? > jr I'm not claiming "formulatory superiority". I'm showing the cs made at 87 uA/sq. in. gives better results on viruses than the cs I made at 1.4 mA/sq. in. There is no need to send anyone any samples. Most people can make it themself. I suggested Bob do this. Unfortunately, he calculates his current density using a large plate anode. His cathode is a small rod. The current density is much higher, and I don't think he will get the same results, sock or no sock. As far as sending him I don't trust Bob's spectrograph results. They indicate his silver content is three times higher than can be obtained using Bob Lee's calculations of Faradays electrolysis equations: > I make 2 gallons of 30 to 40 true PPM using 35 volts with a > regulator set to turn on at 12.6 ma or 320 microamps /sqin of > anode Time, five hours, and this is were I shut down. Crystal > clear sub nano in size, and stays that way!!!!! However, Faradays equations showed the maximum possible is only 12 ppm: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60056.html This is a rather large discrepancy that Bob has not explained. Best Regards, Mike Monett -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
