Mike, I don't have to explain anything!
The results of my spect. testing has been crossed checked with James Holman, Dr. Bruce Marx, Stephen Quinto, Lin Kimball., the univ. of Mo at Rolla, Mo., and your god, Frank Key, as reported on his e-mail to me and Roger Altman when we were running a double blind study on CS. Frank's test showed total silver at 10.915 ppm +/- 0.005, and ionic silver at 10.860 ppm +/- 0.005. the conductivity was 102.5 uS/cm. (21 Oct. 2001) This material was HVAC ARC with CO2 as shown on my web site. with a ppm range from 12 to 15 ppm. I do not know which batch of CS he received. NOW PROVE TO ME THAT YOUR CALCULATIONS ARE CORRECT BY HAVING SOME REPUTABLE LAB CHECK YOU MATERIAL. Since my protocol is suspect!!! The above are my tail feathers, what are yours!!! "Ole Bob" Mike Monett wrote: > url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60406.html > CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux > From: jrowland > Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 10:02:32 > > [...] > > > I, too, am put off by Mike M.'s claims of "formulatory > > superiority" while conveniently refusing Ole Bob's offer of a free > > analysis. > > > Why? > > > jr > > I'm not claiming "formulatory superiority". I'm showing the cs made > at 87 uA/sq. in. gives better results on viruses than the cs I made > at 1.4 mA/sq. in. > > There is no need to send anyone any samples. Most people can make it > themself. I suggested Bob do this. > > Unfortunately, he calculates his current density using a large plate > anode. His cathode is a small rod. The current density is much > higher, and I don't think he will get the same results, sock or no > sock. > > As far as sending him I don't trust Bob's spectrograph results. They > indicate his silver content is three times higher than can be > obtained using Bob Lee's calculations of Faradays electrolysis > equations: > > > I make 2 gallons of 30 to 40 true PPM using 35 volts with a > > regulator set to turn on at 12.6 ma or 320 microamps /sqin of > > anode Time, five hours, and this is were I shut down. Crystal > > clear sub nano in size, and stays that way!!!!! > > However, Faradays equations showed the maximum possible is only 12 > ppm: > > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60056.html > > This is a rather large discrepancy that Bob has not explained. > > Best Regards, > > Mike Monett > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
