For people who are testing water, a difference of 10 or 20 uS probably isn't going to kill em. Nor will it harm us...BUT [doesn't help us much in what we're trying to do.] The water people are probably not trying to compare water readings to something else or add/subtract anything to thier water where the reading is not compared before/after to get a uS gain or decrease.
..and if they were, how would they know? It would seem that us IESers are every instrument makers nightmare. :-) [We have some idea that we should be getting something specific and what it should be.] Ode At 10:47 AM 10/11/2003 -0400, you wrote: >url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m63382.html >Re: CS>Measuring very high ppms >From: Ode Coyote >Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 07:08:22 > >Ken, > >Thanks you for some very important information on PWT problems. > >My turn. All I can say is WOW. > >I got hints of PWT problems from reading the archives, but nothing >concrete and definite as you have shown. > >No one should be offended. You are not attacking anyone. You are simply >stating the truth. If you get a bad response, then that person simply >doesn't care about their responsibilities. > >The PWT seems to be the only inexpensive method of measuring uS. If you >are experiencing problems of this magnitude for single ion species, what >kind of problems are the people having who measure water quality? > >That's the stuff most people drink, you know:) > >I think you are starting to open Pandora's box. That's good. It's time. > >Best Regards, > >Mike Monett > > >-- >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > >Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] > >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
